27 Feb 1999 13:40:14 PST >searchg Blog .U a 1202 Bang usearchj State s Rich osearch,searchj Ukazte searchub 1202 u Bang ujpflashers> Svetu u State dsearchl 1202 n Vyhrajte h Massageparloursmassageparlour - Blog T Bang aaasearchi 1202 ssearch N esearch searchosearche State k Svetu ijpflashersmssearcho1 j1u Vyhrajte r Svetu searchusearcha1ie State a 1202 desearcha 1202 searchoi Ukazte a Bang 1at Vyhrajte esearche Massageparloursmassageparlour , Ukazte searche Svuj tm Blog te1. State Ukazte Jsex%20fuck%20massageatz Bang i State tsearchksearch,v Blog s Divorce i Bang " Svetu a Bang urigsearch"searchu searchg Vyhrajte ui Vyhrajte g"searchisearch ie Get t Bang vi searchijoj Divorce m Blog Get p1rsearch>taa asearchasearchm Vyhrajte ie State psearcheja Bang ajam0psearchs Bang sj Svuj u State aFondled+By+The+Gynocologistm Bang aNatasha+Shy+%2D+First+Ana+%2D+NatashaShy fi Massageparloursmassageparlour io Svetu osearchisksearcham Divorce i 1202 vsearchr Vyhrajte eem. Rich Divorce Jsearch arsearchssearch t Massageparloursmassageparlour searchoma manu bridinajumu neiet uz Pulkvedi, tad tas bija domats pilnigi nopietni, un no sava bridinajuma es neatteiksos, jo briesmas ir pilnigi realas!!!!!! Ja tas tiek domats par Madonna tribute, tad parluko velreiz tos grupu nosaukumus - puse ir kaut kadi 80-to gadu dinozauri, un par parejiem es neko neesmu dzirdejis. Un runajot par briesmam, kas varetu rasties pedejas piles nokratisanai nemanami parejot liksma mastrubacija - es noteikti izbauditu katru mirkli... >P.S. Nothing personal. Vieniigi gribeetu lasiit e-mailus, kur sho nodarbi >netraucee tas paarkoolums, kas dvesh tev pretii. > Nu ko lai es daru, ka esmu tik cool !?!
From : "Uldis Zarins" Reply-To : uldis@mail.usis.bkc.lv To : "ingars rudzitis" Subject : Satellites Date : Sun, 14 Mar 1999 16:06:21 EET He, nu paldies par labiem vardiem, reti jau gadas dzirdet...:-))) Ko lai Tev saka - Zhildes gan nav no laukiem (vismaz nav tur dzimushi, lauki vinjiem, protams ir). Nu sit vinjus nost, nemak vinji savadak dziedat...labi vel ka ta, kad sakam 96. ar Zhildi spelet, es biju shausmas par pashu domu, ka Zhilde varetu dziedat... Jaa, es ari esmu igns, ka nedzird mus ar Tomu (basistu) ieraksta... bet nu ta laikam Zhilde dzird to savu muziku...ka zini, ierobezho tomer ari studiju tehniskas iespejas...varbut esi dzirdejis, ka kopuma mes meginajam 3 vietas rakstities...lidz ar to tads kishmish tur ir, ne visu, ko gribejas (un kas pat tika ierakstits) vareja likt albuma...butiba, Zhildes koncepcija bija par maxisinglu, tobish pirmajam sesham dziesmam, bet ta ka vajadzeja albumu, tad piemestas klat vel ir ari parejas...pamegini iedzit kompi Pienu (hitu) ka wavu un apgriezt ar SoudForgi jeb CoolEditu otradi, tobish, originalaja virziena - sapratisi kapec vinsh vispar tika griezts otradi...:-))) savukart Nekad Nekad bija pirma dziesma, ko mes vispar rakstijam...nu zini jau ka ar pirmajiem sliceniem, butiba jau ta akustene apaksha tur ir laba, tikai solinja vieta gan izklausas bezgala tizli...droshi ja mes vinju rakstitu tagad, vinja izklausitos pavisam savadak...un ir ir ietekme no UK roka, to jau Zhilde nenoliedz, tikai iebilst pret tezi, ka tas viss ir kopets no Oasis - patiesiba ta ietekmju sfera ir daudz plashaka...un par 96 gadu...nu ap to laiku jau tie hiti ari tika taisiti, nu 97, varbut dalja...labi, ko nu es te taisnoshos, kads nu ir tads nu ir, galvenais, ka kaut kas ir lauka un tagad var rullet talak, vareja jau but ari daudz sliktak...starp citu, par talak - nakoshnedelj mes jau atkal ejam studija rakstit nakamo singlu - atkal anglisku ar centralo hitu This is more than you could ever hope, vienu MBValentinisku hitu, vienu hitu ar Shellac bungam, Happy to follow deju remixu un izskanju 20 sek kalvieres ierakstitas uz diktafona...ja viss iznaks ka iecerets vajadzetu but kruto... Zarins P.S. Savukart Tavu Shellacu es diezgan driz pec tam kaut kada BPP live padirsu, tjipa iedevu paturet kamer es tur kaut ko dariju...un aizmirsu kam iedevu pec tam...neviens nebija pat vel paguvis to disku paarrakstit...obidno...bet velreiz vest jau nu tapec nelugshu.:-))))
From : "ingars rudzitis" Reply-To : latvian-indie@parks.lv To : ANINAI@hotmail.com, linardsk@ntbox.parks.lv, SV61011@lanet.lv, LATVIAN-INDIE@parks.lv, mail@divizija.lv Subject : crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy crazy Date : Sat, 01 May 1999 13:27:48 PDT Ok, puisi un meitenes, aizvakar(ceturtdien) beidzot bija UNDERWORLD koncis!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! 2 stundas un 10 minutes of PUR NRfuckinG!!!!!!!!! Durvis atvera 8, mes ieradamis 8:30. Ka iesilditajs speleja kads DJ Ross, vai DJ Rice, isti neatceros. Muzons nesliks, izravam paris alinus, un pielidam pie skatuves. 9:30 beidzot uznaca Underworld. Publika sajusma protams svilpj. Abi programmeri izskatas pec braliem - lidzigi auguma, vienadas pricenes, visiem maksimalas austinas. Tiklidz saka skanet muzika, ta Hyde ar drausmigi smaidigu gimi saka dejot pa skatuvi. Backgrounda kaut kads krasu, uzrakstu mikslis, pa bridim paradija kadu pantomimas terpa iegerbtu onku, kurs centas baigi cooli dejot. Bet visa uzmaniba protams uz Hyde. Nevaretu teikt ka esmu baigais Underworld specs, tapec lielako dalu no kompozicijam dzirdejis nebiju. Bija protams crazy crazy crazy un mega mega un push it. Dzivaja viss protams skaneja lieliski, parejas starp gabaliem nav, vienkarsi notiek ritma maina, un publika atkal sak svilpot un aurot aiz sajusmas. Gabali protams ir garaki un remikseti neka originalas albuma versijas. Pedejo pusstundu Hyde dejoja enu dejas, un iznaca atkal beigas lai nodziedatu the city loves your boyfriend, the city loves you! Hyde protams bija galigi parsvidis no dejosanas, abi programmetaji gan tadi mierigi, tikai ligojas ritma. Vienu bridi gan kaut kas siem nogaja greizi ar miksu, un un uz kadu sekundi sie izkrita no ritma, publika protams smejas, sie klanas, un maj ar roku. Rezultata es no tris stundu nepartrauktas dejosanas biju galigi parguris un nosvidis, tapec biskin pavazajamies pa bariem un uznemam skidrumu.
From : "ingars rudzitis" To : rudzitis@hotmail.com Date : Thu, 20 May 1999 16:44:42 PDT Ingars Rudzitis Arab Cinema The role of women in the Arab family, as seen in the movies. In this paper I am going to look at the role that Arab women are playing in the Arab family. I am going to use a couple of movies we have seen in the class as examples to describe their lives. I think that despite the oppression by the male dominated society, women are far more liberal and have greater control over the family matters than it is usually thought. I am going to look at “The Nights of the Jackal” first. Already in the very beginning of the film we can see the relationship between the husband and wife. Husband is scared of the jackals’ howling, so he wakes up his wife to whistle, and to get them quiet. It shows how he is quite unable and scared to deal with the outside world on his own, in fact the sleepy wife asks: “Who is the men in this house, me or you?” Although the husband has the power to order everybody around, all the daily chores are done by his wife and daughter. While he is doing his morning stretches, the wife is already making butter. Later we see how mother and daughter are baking bread, while father is kicking back and whistling a tune, and both sons are playing and having a good time. While the husband with his violent temperament, and outbursts is more like a child, the wife is the one that keeps in touch with the reality and tries to stay cool. It seems like her whistling symbolizes her ultimate control over the family’s peace. She, and not her husband, is the one to whom the oldest son Tlal tells about his intention to join the army. She deals with family matters like the pregnancy of the youngest daughter. When she learns about it, she says: “Dalel the rational did such thing?”. She doesn’t use religion or beliefs of honor, to make the daughter feel guilty. She appeals to her reason - how could you, the rational one, do such a stupid thing! After her death, the family falls apart, and we see the husband dying too. This movie shows the situation of the rural Arab woman who must deal not only with the hard work in the field, but also has to keep her family together and provide some kind of comfort to everyone. She is the busiest and most hard working members of the family, who can’t let her frustration to take over. No wonder that because of all this stress she dies of heart attack. In “Bye Bye” we again see a strong and rational woman that keeps her family together. Isma’s uncle’s wife is taking care about everything and everybody. Eventhough the uncle says to Isma: “I lay the law down here!”, it obviously isn’t so. Uncle just keeps the appearance of the family’s patriarch, while leaving all the daily family business to his wife. He also clearly understands who has the greater authority in the family when he says to his son: “If I ask, nothing. If it’s your mother, you do!”. She not only takes care about the shopping and cooking, but teaches her daughters English, and consoles Isma. She really can’t rely on her husband. When she asks him to talk seriously to their son, he replies: “I’m reading!”. It seems that uncle is actually satisfied with this situation, when he can scream and shout at everyone, but bears no responsibility. Again the wife is the one, who tries to keep everyone happy. She also understands that Isma is going through tough times, and needs someone who isn’t trying to tell him how to live. In this movie we also see the western influence on the Arab women. Uncle’s wife is almost independent from her husband, and has a free reign in the family. She doesn’t just silently take his abuse and rants, she shouts back, and expresses her opinion freely, even if it is different from her husband’s. Also the young Arab girl is completely westernized. When Isma tells her that she disgusts him, because she is together with him, and his friend, she replies: “You came to me, don’t forget that!”. She is not going to blindly obey the males authority, and she doesn’t feel guilty about the choices she has made. Another movie full of interesting symbolism is “The Sultan of the City”. This movie has two main female characters - Rabha, the family matriarch, and Ramla, the young girls that wants to break free. Rabha, the mother of the family is in control over everything. She tells people what they have to do and decides who’s doing who. Rabha sends Fraj out to perfume shops, and earn some money. She also has chosen the wife for her son Bab. And although the men and women keep separate during the Bab’s celebration of return, Rabha isn’t afraid to call him a dog, when he tries to enter Ramla’s room. She also is very frank when talking about her displeasure with Bab’s lifestyle. She is in this position because her husband is dead, and she has established her dominance by using the younger women of the building, as well as both her sons. Fraj, who himself is an outsider, understands that Ramla doesn’t want to be imprisoned by her faith. She wants to see what is happening outside. Also the one of the women that lives with them, provides Ramla with men’s clothing, and tells her not to stay if she doesn’t want her life to be destroyed. She tells Ramla not to agree on the planned wedding, and to run away. Ramla is clearly dissatisfied with her life, and says: “In this dream everything seems better than what I’m living”. She doesn’t know what the outside can offer her, but she better chooses this uncertainty, than her present life. When Ramla and Fraj finally escape the home, she is the one that want to completely break with the past. When Fraj tries to warn her about the perils and dangers of the city, Ramla responds: “I want to be exiled! Why don’t you open your eyes to a vast new world, other people, better life?”. “This is my limit”, says Fraj, he physically can’t step out from the old world. So they return to the old neighborhood, because Fraj can’t step over his fear. And once there, Ramla is raped by the Bab’s friends. I think what we see here is the presentation of the situation of the Arab women generally. They are virtually imprisoned by the society, and as such they are the ones who want to have some change. They don’t know exactly what they want, or how it should be, but they know that they are fed up with the existing order. However, they can’t do it on their own. The men in the society also are bound by the tradition and are prisoners themselves. They are confined to their role of a macho men, and they keep this mask in the society, but in the reality they don’t really have much influence over what is going on, because their family lives are left under the control of the women. And so there is this this strange situation in which women are quite independent and active in the family life, and want to get more say also in the society matters. They are prevented from this by the men who are to lose their influence and power. As we see in Ramla’s example when a woman wants to break free, she either has to do it completely, or be crushed by the old male dominated world for being different.
From : "ingars rudzitis" To : rudzitis@hotmail.com Subject : anger Date : Tue, 14 Sep 1999 22:41:49 PDT This is a reaction paper to the chapter 2 from the “Anger”. I am writing this paper because it seemed interesting to me how Tavris is describing the unvoluntary anger that is created when two different cultures meet. I will try to come up with some ideas for explaining the reasons of anger between Americans and Europeans, since I am pretty similar with the situation. I have met people from many countries of the world, and usually when talking about Americans they are described as loud, stupid, uncultured and ignorant, even arrogant. And frankly, I have to agree, but I am very aware that so are the people from all the other nationalities. I can use French as an example - dirty, smoking and rude... Tavris writes, that because a major function of anger is to maintain the social order, through its moralizing implications of how people “should” behave, it is predictable that when two social orders collide they would generate angry sparks (65). I think this explains, why Americans are so often complaining that on their trips abroad they have been treated bad, and that everyone was rude to them. Most of Americans have no other experiences with foreign countries besides Canada or Mexico. Therefore, on their trips abroad most of Americans simply don’t know how to behave. Majority of them speak only English, and usually have no idea about the culture and history of the country they’re visiting. Obviously there is no wonder that local people are pretty unfriendly, or make fun about them. Americans are wieved as people who feel better than anyone else, but in actuality are just bossy simpletons. This anti